RUN-OFF ESTIMATION FOR THE KARJAN RIVER BASIN USING NRCS CN METHOD

Authors

  • Ketan Sondarva CAET, NAU, Dediapada-393040, Gujarat, India
  • Prashantkumar Shrivastava CAET, NAU, Dediapada-393040, Gujarat, India
  • Priti Jayswal KVK, JAU, Amreli-365601, Gujarat, India
  • Vibhuti Patel CAET, NAU, Dediapada-393040, Gujarat, India

Keywords:

water management, watershed

Abstract

In a large watershed the surface runoff generated may significantly affects environment, agriculture, and the availability of flood potential (Jayswal et al., 2021) The runoff generated from the watershed runoff determines the soil erosion condition and other hydraulic properties of soil and alsopotential runoff availability for the water management. The runoff from a watershed can be measured using different methods and empirical models based on daily, monthly or annually depending on rainfall pattern, infiltration rate and the morphometric characteristics of the watershed (Sondarva et al.2023). There are several hydrological models available for estimation of runoff out of which most of the models requires large number of input data. The Natural Resources Conservation Service Curve Number (NRCS-CN) method which is formerly known as Soil conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN), is the one of the most reliable and oldest method for the estimation of runoff from 
precipitation. It can be used very effectively in the ArcGIS. When runoff estimation deals with the ungauged watershed, where such detailed information is seldom available. Perhaps the most popular technique for meeting this need is the curve number method developed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). The Curve Number method estimates the direct runoff from storm rainfall based on data from watershed. This method is most relevant and it considers the physiographic and hydrologic condition of the watershed (Bans ode et al. 2014). One of the most significant advantages of this method is that it relies on single conceptual parameter called as maximum potential retention (S) or corresponding Curve Number. However, the CN method cannot respond to the differences in storm intensity and Antecedent Moisture Condition (AMC). The error made in the selection of CN can reflect many folds in the estimation of runoff. 

References

Abbaspour, K. C. 2012. SWAT- Calibration and Uncertainty Programs.

Jayswal, P.S.; Gontia N.K. and Sondarva, K. N. 2021. Morphometric study of Dhatarwadi river basin using RS and GIS techniques. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 40(10): 1-11.

Jayswal, P. S., Gontia, N. K., Sondarva, K. N., Patel, V. A. 2023. Site Selection for Rainwater Harvesting Using Remote Sensing, GIS and AHP. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, Volume 35(18):1360-1378. DOI:10.9734/IJPSS/2023/v35i183403

Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D. and Veith, T. L. 2007. Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations. Transactions of the ASABE.50(3): 885-900.

Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V. 1970. River Flow Forecasting Through Conceptual Models Part I—a Discussion of Principles. J Hydrol, 10(3):282–290.

Neitsch, S.L.; Arnold, J.G.; Kiniry, J.R. and Williams. J.R. 2005. Soil and Water Assessment Tool—Theoretical Documentation, Version 2005. Temple, Texas, USA.

Nyeko, M. 2010. Land use change in Aswa Basin Northern Uganada; Opportunity and Constrains to water resources management. Degree Diss., University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.

Prakasam, Chakkra. 2010. Land use and land cover change detection through remote sensing approach: Acass study of Kodaikanal taluk, Tamilnadu. International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences. 1:150-158.

Santhi, C., Arnold, J. G., Williams, J. R., Dugas, W. A. and Hauck, L. 2001. Validation of the SWAT Model on a Large River Basin with Point and Non-point Sources. Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 37(5): 1169–1188.

Sevat, E. and Dezetter, A. 1991. Selection of calibration objective functions in the context of rainfall-runoff modeling in a Sudanese Savannah Area. Hydrol Sci J, 36(4):307–330.

Sondarva K.N.; Dhodia, J. and Jayswal. P.S. 2023. Morphometric analysis of Shel dedumal watershed using remote sensing and GIS. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 19 (1): 193-199.

Sondarva, K. N. and Jayswal, P. S. 2023. Land use/ Land cover change study of the lower Tapi river basin using remote sensing and Geographic Information System, Current Advances in Agricultural Sciences, 15(1): 37-43.

Van Liew, M. W. and Garbrecht, J. 2003. Hydrologic Simulation of the Little Washita River Experiment Watershed using SWAT. Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 39(2): 413-426.

Yadav P. K., Mohnish Kapoor, Kiranmay Sarma, 2012. Land Use Land Cover Mapping, Change Detection and Conflict Analysis of Nagzira-Navegaon Corridor, Central India Using Geospatial Technology, International Journal of Remote Sensing and GIS, 1(2):90-98.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-20