SCOPE OF CONTRACT FARMING WITH REFERENCE TO FARMERS OF INDIA
Keywords:
Contract Farming Models, Monopsony, Backward and Forward Linkages, Technology, Reverse TenancyAbstract
Starting with the abolition of zamindari system and introduction of cooperative farming and joint farming, different institutional arrangements have been tried to reorganise the land and production relations for changing the farming systems and enhancing the productivity of the small and marginal farmers who constitute nearly eighty per cent of the farming community in India and are the main stakeholders in any policy reforms. Yet, they continue to be the major chunk of poor in the country even after sixty years of independence. While different policy options were attempted in the form of direct and indirect interventions, in the shape of target group and target area oriented approaches, commodity specific and region. Specific missions, yet the twin facts of farmers’ poverty and low productivity remained unabated. Two primary reasons behind the continuing poverty and low productivity are cited to be non-viability of the small and marginal farmers and inadequacies in the service/ input delivery system. With the advent of globalization, the task of reorganising the small and marginal farmers assumed greater importance to face the challenges of the market economy. The experience of the post-globalisation era has thrown various alternative options for reorganising the small and marginal farmers to make interventions in the existing farming systems. Changes in the institutional arrangements of land tenure system like land leasing, contract and corporate farming are some of the emerging alternatives which have the potential of not only making small and marginal farms economically viable, but also have implications for land markets in a market economy. While each of these institutional arrangements have their own socio-economic implications, a systematic study needs to be undertaken on the strengths and weaknesses and their potential in changing the existing farming systems from low yielding uncompetitive agriculture to economically viable and sustainable agriculture.
Â
Contract Farming (CF) is one option that has opened up for farmers in the recent past with the liberalisation of agriculture and amendment of (APMC) Acts, where the farmers can reduce the risk of production and prices by tying up with the companies. Agriculture being one of the important components of the economy, many corporate giants like Bharati Tele Ventures, PepsiCo India, HLL, Tata, DCM Shriram, Reliance Industries, etc., have entered into agribusiness and retail business. Many studies on this subject provide contradictory views regarding the pros and cons of CF, particularly its effect on small and marginal farmers. Hence, this paper attempts to understand the conceptual framework of contract farming and its effect on small and marginal farmers through some cases and analyses what needs to be done in future.
Starting with the abolition of zamindari system and introduction of cooperative farming and joint farming, different institutional arrangements have been tried to reorganise the land and production relations for changing the farming systems and enhancing the productivity of the small and marginal farmers who constitute nearly eighty per cent of the farming community in India and are the main stakeholders in any policy reforms. Yet, they continue to be the major chunk of poor in the country even after sixty years of independence. While different policy options were attempted in the form of direct and indirect interventions, in the shape of target group and target area oriented approaches, commodity specific and region. Specific missions, yet the twin facts of farmers’ poverty and low productivity remained unabated. Two primary reasons behind the continuing poverty and low productivity are cited to be non-viability of the small and marginal farmers and inadequacies in the service/ input delivery system. With the advent of globalization, the task of reorganising the small and marginal farmers assumed greater importance to face the challenges of the market economy. The experience of the post-globalisation era has thrown various alternative options for reorganising the small and marginal farmers to make interventions in the existing farming systems. Changes in the institutional arrangements of land tenure system like land leasing, contract and corporate farming are some of the emerging alternatives which have the potential of not only making small and marginal farms economically viable, but also have implications for land markets in a market economy. While each of these institutional arrangements have their own socio-economic implications, a systematic study needs to be undertaken on the strengths and weaknesses and their potential in changing the existing farming systems from low yielding uncompetitive agriculture to economically viable and sustainable agriculture.
Contract Farming (CF) is one option that has opened up for farmers in the recent past with the liberalisation of agriculture and amendment of (APMC) Acts, where the farmers can reduce the risk of production and prices by tying up with the companies. Agriculture being one of the important components of the economy, many corporate giants like Bharati Tele Ventures, PepsiCo India, HLL, Tata, DCM Shriram, Reliance Industries, etc., have entered into agribusiness and retail business. Many studies on this subject provide contradictory views regarding the pros and cons of CF, particularly its effect on small and marginal farmers. Hence, this paper attempts to understand the conceptual framework of contract farming and its effect on small and marginal farmers through some cases and analyses what needs to be done in future.
References
2. Bhalla, G S and G Singh (1996): Impact of GATT on Punjab Agriculture, Ajanta Publications, Delhi.
3. CDC, CDC and the Small Farmer London: CDC, 1984.
4. Compiled article, “Contract Farming Ventures in India: A Few Successful Casesâ€, Agriculture Today September, 2003
5. Chidambaram, M (1997): A Study of Export Potentials for Gherkins (Hybrid Cucumber) in Tamilnadu, Department of Agricultural Economics, Centre for Agriculture and Rural Development Studies, TAU, Coimbatore (unpublished).
6. Deshingkar, P, U Kulkarni, L Rao and S Rao (2003):“Changing Food Systems in India: Resource Sharing and Marketing Arrangements for Vegetable Production in Andhra Pradesh,†Development Policy Review, 21(5-6): 627-639.
7. Dev, S M and N C Rao (2004): “Food Processing in Andhra Pradesh – Opportunities and Challengesâ€, CESS Working Paper No. 57, Centre for Economic and Social Studies (CESS), Hyderabad, June.
8. Dhaliwal, H S, M Kaur, and J Singh (2003): Evaluation of Contact Farming Scheme in the Punjab State, Department of Economics, PAU, Ludhiana.
9. Dileep, B K, R K Grover, and K N Rai (2002): Contract Farming in Tomato: An Economic Analysisâ€, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57(2), 197-210.
10. Eaton, C and A W Shepherd (2001): Contract Farming: Partnerships for Growth, FAO, Rome.
11. Glover D and Ken Kusterer (eds) 1990: Small Farmers, Big Business – Contract Farming and Rural Development, St Marten, NY.
12. GoI (Govt. of India) (2003): Contract Farming Agreement and its Model Specifications, Ministry of Agriculture, Department of Agriculture and Co-operation, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi, September 17.
13. GoI (Govt, of India) (2004): Economic Survey 2003-04, Ministry of Finance, GoI, New Delhi.
14. Haque, T. (1999 b), Contract Farming in India, National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, New Delhi (mimeo).
15. Haque, T (2003): “Land Reforms and Agricultural Development: Retrospect and Prospectâ€, in S Pal et al (eds.): Institutional Change in Indian Agriculture, NCAP, New Delhi, 267-284.
16. Hill B E and K A Ingersent (1987): An Economic Analysis of Agriculture, London, Heinemann.
17. Rangi, P S and M S Sindhu (2003): “Contract Farming in Punjabâ€, Productivity, 44(3), 484-491.
18. Siddiqui, K: Agricultural Exports, Poverty and Ecological Crisis-Case Study of Central American Countriesâ€, Economic and Political Weekly, 33(39), September 26-October 2, 1998.
19. Kumar, D.L. Raghava and Suparna Barua (1998) “Study of Production Logistics and Marketing System of the Seed Industry in Andhra Pradeshâ€, MTS Report No.1239, Anand: Institute of Rural Management (IRMA).
20. Little PD : “Contract Farming and the Development Question†in Peter D Little and Michael J Watts (eds): Living Under Contract-Contract Farming and Agrarian Transformation in Sub-Saharan Africa, the University of Wisconsin Press, Madison (1994).
21. Prabhu C (2004): Managing Contract Farming in Agro Industry, FPM Thesis, IIM, Ahmedabad, March.
22. Rangi, P S and M S Sidhu (2003): “Contract Farming in Punjabâ€, Productivity, 44(3), 484-491.
23. Rao, V M and H G Hanumappa (1999): “Marginalisation Process in Agriculture – Indicators, Outlook and Policy Implicationsâ€, Economic and Political Weekly, 34(52), A133-A138.
24. Rethinam, P (1999) : ‘Oil Palm Research and Development in India’ in P.Rethinam and K. Suresh (eds), Oil Palm Research and Development, National Research Centre for Oil Palm, Pedavegi, West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.
25. Rickson, R.E. and D.Burch: “Contract Farming in Organizational Agriculture: The effects upon farmers and the environment†in D. Burch, R.E.Rickson and G.Lawrence (eds.): Globalisation and Agri-Food Restructuring-Perspectives from the Australasia Region, Avebury, Brookfield (USA), 1996.
26. Scott , C.D (1984): “Transnational Corporations and Asymmetries in the Latin American Food Systemâ€, Bulletin of Latin American Research, 3(1), 63-80, January.
27. Singh, Sukhpal (2000 a) : ‘Contract Farming for Agricultural Diversification in Indian Punjab : A Study of Performance and Problems’, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 55, No.3, July-September, p.283-94.
28. __ (2000 b) : ‘Theory and Practice of Contract Farming : A Review’, Journal of Social and Economic Development, Vol.3, No.2, July-December, p.228-46.
29. Singh, S (2002): “Contracting Out Solutions: Political Economy of Contract Farming in the Indian Punjabâ€, World Development, 30(9), 1621-1638.
30. Siddiqui K.: “Agricultural Exports, Poverty and Ecological Crisis-Case Study of Central American Countriesâ€, Economic and Political Weekly, 33(39), Sept 26 (1998).
31. USAID (United States Agency for International Development: Assessment of Contract Farming in Lam Nam Oon, Thailand, Centre for Development Information and Evaluation, USAID working paper No.193, USAID and the The Royal Thai Government, April 1994.
32. WB (World Bank) (2003): India: Revitalizing Punjab’s Agriculture, Rural Development Unit, South Asia Region, The World Bank, Washington.
33. Vyas, V S (1996): “Diversification in Agriculture: Concept, Rationale and Approachesâ€, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51 (4), 636-643.
34. WB (World Bank) (2004): Resuming Punjab’s Prosperity- The Opportunities and Challenges Ahead, The World Bank, Washington and New Delhi.